Quantcast

Why I’m Bullish on Google+ Again

I joined Google+ on the day that it became available, and have always enjoyed the service. I generally find the web interface to offer a nice, visual view that allows me to easily connect with and browse the work of other photographers. It’s a much nicer experience that some other leading social networks.

While the Google+ web browser experience was pretty good, their mobile experience (at least on the iPhone) was pretty bad. There was a lot of wasted space, navigation was cumbersome, and some serious performance problems made it an onerous task to do something as simple as post a status update or share a photograph. My mobile photo sharing continued to focus on other applications while I mostly ignored Google+ when I was away from my desk.

The lack of a good mobile app led me to question how much time I’d spend with the service in the future. I became skeptical.

And then last week, this happened:

Google+ photo display Google+ photo display

An update to the iPhone app brings a new, beautiful photo-centric display which makes browsing a Google+ steam a very nice experience… arguably even better than the Instagram stream which now looks a bit plain by comparison. It’s easy to +1 photos (just tap on the + count), easy to comment, and the performance when posting new items is improved. In short, Google got this mobile experience right. Mobile photography is a big deal ($1 billion for Instagram, anyone?), and a beautiful mobile experience represents a big plus (pun intended) for Google.

There’s one big piece that’s missing (still): an API for third-party apps. My current mobile photo workflow involves using Camera Awesome to upload mobile photos to SmugMug and then cross-post to social services (sometimes Twitter, sometimes Facebook, sometimes Instagram). If I could post the images easily to Google+ as well, that would be a huge time-saver that could only increase my usage of Google+ while on the go.

I’m on the fence about switching to Google+ as my primary mobile social network (instead of Instagram). The API would make it easier, but it’s not too bad now with the new app. There’s a local Instagram meetup in a few days; I’m curious to hear what other Instagram users think about the new Google+ interface…

Join me?


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

Easy Online Invoicing: I Like FreshBooks

FreshBooks Online InvoicingRunning a photography business (much like running any small business) involves not only the activities directly related to serving my clients, but also various bits of overhead such as bookkeping and invoicing. These administrative tasks aren’t where I want to spend most of my time, but I want to ensure my clients receive great service.

I use FreshBooks for invoicing and have done so for a few years now. It’s easy for me and my clients seem happy as well. Yesterday I received this comment in an email message:

Aaron – I just have to say that your site/process for accounting stuff (freshbooks) is SUPER awesome and easy. LOVE IT.

When my clients are happy, I’m happy. FreshBooks allows me to invoice via email or paper and allows me to receive/record payments via checks, PayPal, or a number of other services. Invoices can be customized to reflect your look and feel.

You can try FreshBooks for free for 30 days using this link. If you sign up, I get a small referral commission.


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

Three Little Words that Trigger Disappointment

Piled TechThree little words tell me so much about someone’s attitude about their software values.

The conversation usally happens after I mention an app or web service provider. Perhaps I mention how much I like Instacast. Or maybe I show how I love the Instapaper iPad app. Possibly I’m blabbing about how SmugMug is a great way to show off and sell photos.

And then it happens. The first words out of their mouth. Or maybe not the first words, but it’s usually not far behind.

Is it free?

I sigh. Sometimes audibly, sometimes internally. I’m disappointed. I’m disappointed that we’ve reached a situation where free has become the standard by which comparisons are made. Software is hard. Applications and web services represent the results of dozens, hundreds, or thousands of hours of work. And the response when I suggest a great $2 application often begins with “is it free?” This response comes from someone usually carrying a $200 smartphone for which they’re paying $40-100 each month.

The software or services in my examples will help you keep up with news and entertainment, improve your reading experience, or allow you to archive and present your creative works in a beautiful way. And you sit and hem and haw about whether or not it’s worth the price of a coffee.

The Oatmeal said it well.


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

On Facebook, Instagram, and Me

Facebook logoI generally don’t hide the fact that I loathe Facebook. The company has repeatedly made moves which aren’t good for the internet, yet somehow has convinced most of the world that they should spend hours each week participating on the Facebook website. I reluctantly use the service since it’s a way to keep up with some people who, for various reasons, don’t use the rest of the internet.

Until last Monday, I was a big Instagram fan. I actively used the service, enjoying the photo-based social network. And then Facebook bought Instagram.

Instagram IconI stopped using Instagram and haven’t uploaded any photos since the acquisition. I didn’t go as far as deleting my account, but I wanted to spend some time thinking about what a Facebook-owned Instagram would mean, and whether or not I wanted to participate in such an endeavor.

While I’m pretty sure that Facebook will find some way to screw up Instagram, I’m going to continue as an Instagram user for the time being. The social network component of Instagram has no equal and I want to continue participating with the individuals I’ve met via the app. Although I’d love to quit Instagram on principle, there isn’t another viable photography social network where I can interact and share at the level that’s possible via Instagram.

I will also be uploading all of my mobile photos to a SmugMug gallery so that I’ll have a copy of my images in the event that Facebook does something stupid.

Feel free to add me on Instagram, my username is aaronhockley.


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

7 Things I Wish I Knew When I Started Using Instagram

Instagram IconI see that Instagram is now available for Android. As someone who was a late-comer to the Instagram thing (but who has now used it for almost a year), here’s what I wish I knew when I started:

  • Don’t Think of Instagram as Photo Hosting. Instagram ends up storing your photos, yes, but it’s not somewhere for a permanent archive, or to keep things you want to embed elsewhere. Instead, you should…
  • Think of Instagram as a Photo-Centric Social Network. Connect with interesting people. Comment on their photos. Like their photos. Share the love.
  • Follow creative people. If you follow interesting people who are making interesting images, you’ll find that Instagram is great. If you follow people who only post boring photos, you’re going to find that you don’t get much fun from Instagram. It’s much like any other social network.
  • Ignore the haters. Some will tell you that you’re doing photography wrong. You’re not.
  • Keep a permanent copy of your Instagram photos elsewhere. Maybe you want to upload them to your computer. Maybe you want to use an app on your photo to post them somewhere else online (I’m now keeping a copy of things in a SmugMug gallery). Maybe you want to use ifttt to automatically save a copy of your Instagram photos to Dropbox.
  • Find a local Instagram meetup and go meet some other local photography enthusiasts. Here in Portland, there’s a gathering about once each month. Do a search for Instagram meetup and your city in Google to find your local group. You will meet cool people and perhaps go on photowalks to create neat photos.
  • Use the News / Following feature to see what your connections are doing. If you’re following someone because you think they are a good photographer, odds are that they have good taste and can connect you to other people you might want to follow.

Are you an instagram user? What else do you wish folks knew?


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

iPhoto for the iPad: My Question (and Reaction)

Update: iPhoto was in fact announced. Further thoughts at the bottom of this original article.

Please do not handle.  At Pike Place Market in Seattle.Some well-reasoned pundit speculation about the hours-away iPad 3 announcement indicates we may see iPhoto announced for the iPad. You’d think I’d be all excited about that as a photographer, right?

I’m an Adobe Lightroom user who’s found the experience of editing photos on the iPad to be clunky, awkward, and slow. These problems weren’t because of software, but because a finger-touch system is a crappy way to make precise photo edits. iPhoto won’t fix that.

Why should I care about a system that will involve importing photos from some external camera device, editing them in a clunky interface, and managing them in a system which isn’t compatible with Lightroom?

What am I missing?

Update after the announcement: Apple did announce iPhoto for iOS (both iPad and iPhone). I might load it on my iPhone, but I’m pretty sure I’ll never really use it on the iPad. As I mentioned when I wrote this piece last night, the issue isn’t software – it’s hardware and workflow. I don’t capture images on my iPad… so if I’m going to spend the time to import images onto another device for editing, why would I import to the iPad (with a limited set of photo editing tools) instead of my MacBook Air (with Lightroom)? And when I’m done editing and want to share the photos online, would I rather do that from the iPad one-app-at-a-time interface where sharing/uploads are often clunky, or would I rather do that as a Lightroom export including the various publish services?


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

VentureBeat Flubs Flickr/Pinterest Restrictions: It’s Not a Copyright Situation

Code RedIn the interest of publishing a sensationalist Pinterest story (it’s all the rage right now, ya know), tonight VentureBeat seriously bungled their story about a move by Flickr to restrict the pinning of some images. VentureBeat’s article is titled Flickr disables Pinterest pins on all copyrighted images. However, as they say in the voiceover in the opening credits of the Alcatraz TV show, that’s not what happened. Not at all.

The Flickr restrictions have nothing to do with whether the photos are copyrighted.

In a quick primer on US copyright law1 (which we’ll cite since Flickr is here in the US), I’ll note that all works, such as photographs, are protected by copyright at the moment they are created. Even those works that the creator has chosen to license under Creative Commons (relatively common on Flickr) are protected by copyright law. Thus, if Flickr truly were disabling pinning for any copyrighted photo, they’d be disabling sharing site-wide.

What Flickr actually said, according to the VentureBeat article, was this:

Flickr has implemented the tag and it appears on all non-public/non-safe pages, as well as when a member has disabled sharing of their Flickr content … This means only content that is ‘safe,’ ‘public’ and has the sharing button enabled can be pinned to Pinterest.

What this means:

  • You can’t pin photos marked as private
  • You can’t pin photos that are marked as being for adult audiences only
  • You can’t pin photos where the Flickr user has explicitly disabled sharing
  • Photos not in one of these three categories can be pinned.

If a photographer is allowing their content to be Tweeted, blogged, or otherwise shared, it can still be shared via Pinterest. If a photographer has chosen to lock things down so that their work can’t be shared, that restriction is now honered with respect to Pinterest. This seems like a correct decision by Flickr. A better headline might have been “Flickr Adds Pinterest Restrictions to Better Reflect Users’ Sharing Preferences” but that just doesn’t sound quite as exciting.


  1. The fact that writers for a major publication, itself protected by copyright law, don’t understand copyright law, bothers me. 


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

Email Isn’t Broken; You Are

Every few weeks it seems we hear again about how email is broken and some new technology or team is out to fix it. Yesterday the story involved some ex-Google Wave team members who are attempting to reinvent email.

Email is not broken. Perhaps your system for dealing with it is broken.

BustedI process several hundred email messages per day and at the end of the day each one is dealt with in some fashion. Dealt with. That doesn’t necessarily mean that I read the message, or that I replied to it, but that it’s been handled. Assuming that you’re required to handle email1, read on.

In general, when I chat with folks overwhelmed by email, I find that they have problems with one of three areas:

  • Inability to read
  • Inability to process
  • Inability to eliminate

Read Email Better

You need to be able to quickly read email. And when I say read, I mean “understand what the message says.” One aspect, to which you’ll say “duh” but probably haven’t spent any time to improve, is pure reading speed. How quickly can you read? Have you ever measured this? Have you done anything to improve your reading speed? Someone who can read 40% faster than you can plow through incoming email 40% faster than you. If you’re spending 2 hours per day reading email, that other guy is spending just over an hour.

The other key to reading email better is to stop reading all of your email. Skim. Use the subject lines. If the subject line of the message indicates it’s not of importance or something that needs to be investigated futher, get rid of it and don’t even look at the body. When you start reading the body of a message, learn to skim through and pick out the key points. One key point is what are you supposed to do as a result of the message? Are you expected to reply? Are you expected to file the bit of knowledge away for future reference? Are you supposed to take some offline action? The quicker you can figure out the answer to this question, the quicker you’ve started what should be the next step in email processing (see next section).

Process Email Better

A big timesink of email processing is the amount of time spent deciding what to do with a message, and then wasting extra time with overhead or processing of said message. I don’t know anyone who gets paid to read email, so let’s get it behind us and move onto things that might actually make money, like responding to some email, selling products, making something, or engaging in some networking or business development.

If you’re spending time moving your hand to your mouse and clicking and dragging email around to different folders, you’re wasting time. Sure, it’s 5 seconds per message, but if you do this with 100 messages per day, you’ve wasted over eight minutes. You need an email system that:

  • Lets you easily find messages based on a text search (this eliminates the need to folder-ize everything)
  • Allows you to move messages to an archive with a keystroke combination

GMail’s web client can do both of these things. Desktop apps such as Sparrow can as well. If your email software sucks, use better software. It pains me to watch people spend several seconds per message clicking and dragging items into nested folders, which will then take several seconds to navigate when one wants to retrieve said mail.

How I process email, in no particular order:

  • If a message is useless, it gets deleted.
  • If a message contains information I might want in the future, it gets archived.
  • If a message requires a reply that will take less than a couple minutes, I reply. Right then. The mental cost of having to come back to messages that simply need a quick reply is a huge cost compared with just getting it done.
  • If a message requires a reply at some point in the future (not soon), I create a task in OmniFocus, give it an appropriate start date, and archive the message.
  • If a message requires a reply soon that will take more than a couple minutes, I leave it in my mailbox and it becomes an implicit task to be completed before the end of the day. “End of the day” can be defined how you’d like; maybe it means before you leave your office or maybe it means before you go to sleep, but if there’s mail in your inbox, it needs to be dealt with. Maybe that means a reply. Maybe that means storing it away and creating a task in OmniFocus (or your to-do list system of choice). But email can’t live in your inbox for days or weeks.

Stop kidding yourself about stuff you might do. You know what I mean. Those messages that you might take action on? Or those people that might eventually get a reply? Stop joking with yourself and just delete or archive those messages.

It’s a few years old, but the processing workflow from David Allen’s Getting Things Done is still timely today. If you haven’t read the book, it’s an easy read and quite affordable. I recommend it even if you’re not going to dive into the full GTD system.

Eliminate Email Better

Eliminating the amount of incoming email is a fantastic way to improve your email efficiency. Here are some specific things to eliminate:

  • Mailing lists for technologies, groups, or other entities of which you don’t have an active day to day interest. If you really think you want this email, switch your email delivery to a digest form so that you’re only getting one message per day or week rather than every message as it’s sent.
  • Social network notifications (“bacn“) that’s redundant with other notifications. Facebook gives you notifications when you hit the Facebook website… do you really need it via email as well? If you’re looking at new Twitter followers based on email notifications, you’re wasting time. Do you really need an email interruption to tell you that someone liked that thing you posted to Pinterest? I didn’t think so. Eliminate this email.
  • Advertising. Sure, you subscribe to Office Depot’s weekly email because every once in a while it might contain a good deal. But is it worth the mental and time overhead of dealing with that message every week in hopes of saving $5 on a case of paper?
  • Daily deals (Groupon, Google Offers, etc). If the deal’s that great, you’re going to hear about it via other means. Heck, when the deals are good, sometimes it seems like a neverending stream of it on Facebook, Twitter, etc. There’s no need to clutter up my inbox with that as well.

On Volume, and Moving Forward

While most of the so-called email overload is caused by poor planning or management (which can be remedied by the various tips above), there is another possibility: you might simply have too much work (including email) to do. That isn’t an email problem. That’s a workload problem, and it needs to be addressed in a similar fashion to other workload problems.

The important things will prioritize themselves. I suspect that, like me, you’re responding quickly to those who want to give you money for a product or service. I suspect that you reply or react efficiently to a family member or close friend with an urgent situation. The messages with are truly important aren’t the problem. The problem is the fluff, the cruft, and the inefficient processes which prevent you from working with the important stuff.

The good news is that it’s a lot easier to improve our processes than it is to replace a deeply-entrenched technology that isn’t really flawed.

Also: email is not dead. Death is dead.


  1. If you don’t have to do email, and you don’t like email, stop doing email. You can’t? Then you have to do email, and you might as well figure out how to do it in a way that you don’t hate. 


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

Create a New OmniFocus Task from the Current URL in Google Chrome (via Alfred)

A bit of productivity porn this morning: here’s how to create a new OmniFocus Inbox task from the current page in Google Chrome. I use Alfred as my launcher, this could be adapted for other systems.

  1. Open the Alfred Preferences, go to the Extensions area, and click AppleScript: Alfred AppleScript extension
  2. Give the Extension a name (I called mine OmniURL). I also added the information for the person who authored the AppleScript that will be used. Click Create.Alfred OmniFocus setup
  3. Add a title (I used OmniURL again), optionally add a description, give it a keyword (this is what you’ll type to activate it from Alfred), and be sure the Background box is checked.
  4. In the AppleScript box, copy and paste this AppleScript from github user rfbrazier into the box.Alfred OmniFocus Setup
  5. Click Save and close the Alfred Preferences.

Next time you’re on a web page in Chrome and want to create a related OmniFocus task, just invoke the OmniURL item from Alfred (you could also set a hotkey). A new item will be created in your OmniFocus inbox with the page’s title as the item text and the URL in the notes field.


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+

If Path’s Privacy Screwup Didn’t Bother You, Perhaps Their Incompetence Does

Last week we all found out that Path was uploading our address books without any sort of notice or confirmation. For me, that was enough to make me quit the service whereas others seem willing to give Path a pass and accept their apology of “Oh, we don’t think it’s a problem but since everyone else in the world does I guess we’ll make it opt-in.”

On February 7th, I requested my account be deleted using the instructions on Path’s support website.

On February 13th, I noticed that my account was still active so I tweeted and got a response:

I headed over to the web form and filled it out, again. That was two days ago. I just got a friend acceptance message from another user on Path. I’m still able to sign into my account. Path apparently has yet to delete it. Either they can’t figure out how to use their web contact form, or they’re refusing to delete my account.

Are you willing to hand over all of your friends’ phone numbers, email address, home addresses, and other personal information to a company that can’t figure out how to use a web contact form to delete an account?

Update 2/16: After nine days, two support requests via their contact form and two Twitter messages, Path has deleted my account.


If you found this interesting, share it with your friends on Facebook, Twitter, or Google+